Nebraska Notary Case Moves to Nebraska Supreme Court
We said we would keep you up to date on this story, so here it goes.
To backtrack, a Nebraska notary was accused of signing fraudulent signatures regarding the state’s medical marijuana bill. It amounted to 24 counts of improper notarization. The case was dismissed and then brought back to life via appeal.
And then the notary threw his ring in the hat to run for Governor of Nebraska.
We could try to go more in depth, but why don’t you check out our previous articles on the topic.
- Accused Nebraska Notary to Run for Governor
- Nebraska Notary Case Back On
- Nebraska Notary Saga Goes On
- They Asked for It, They Got It
- In the News – November 2024
Well, it jumped to the Nebraska Supreme Court. And they heard first arguments on Wednesday, December 3rd.
The Players in the Arguments
So, we have Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana. Then we have former State Senator John Kuehn. Then a cross-filing was submitted by Secretary of State Bob Evnen. This is the guy who certified the signatures allowing the referendum to go on the ballot.
Both Kuehn and Evnen are asking the Nebraska Supreme Court to send the case back to a lower court.
Evnen’s lawyers argue that the case should be remanded to the lower court for the second part of the trial. They want the sponsors of the bill to prove they had enough valid signatures for the referendum.
Nebraskan’s for Medical Marijuana argued that Evnen does not have standing for this case, as he had a duty to certify ballots.
“We ask as a practical manner, for the benefit of the parties, for the benefit of the lawyers, and most importantly, for the benefit of the public, can Secretary Evnen certified the initiative, pull the plug at the last minute, admit he has no standing under the exclusive statutory provision, and then circumvent that through the declaratory judgment act?,” said Daniel Gutman, an attorney representing Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana.

Kuehn’s lawyers pointed to how the alleged fraud could affect future ballot initiatives. They basically say that if the current ruling from the lower court is allowed to stand, then any two people could game the system and get any future initiative they want onto the ballot.
It is an interesting argument, but one has to wonder how two people could do this.
But, Kuehn’s lawyers addressed that. They said that all people accused of malfeasance would have to do is invoke the fifth amendment.
Overall, this seems like it raised more questions than answers. But we guess that is probably the point of hearings like these.
And it appears the saga will continue.

Your Nationwide Notary Signing Service
Increase your efficiency and bottom line with Sunshine’s Mobile Notary Services and Online Notary Services. Sunshine is always there when you need us.



